Dunmere Capital evaluates real-asset–backed opportunities using conservative assumptions, defined value-add plans, and clear exit reasoning — prioritizing downside protection over theoretical upside.
This page outlines Dunmere’s intended framework and risk posture. It does not represent historical performance or guaranteed outcomes.
Each potential project must earn its place through pricing discipline, execution clarity, and realistic exit assumptions.
Pricing must be supported by comparable sales and reasonable cost assumptions. Opportunities that only work under ideal conditions or rely on market appreciation are generally avoided.
Projects are expected to involve identifiable, measurable improvements such as cosmetic updates or efficiency gains. Full structural reconfigurations or highly specialized builds typically fall outside the firm’s current mandate.
Primary and secondary exit paths are identified upfront. If a project lacks plausible alternatives or depends on a narrow outcome, it is unlikely to proceed.
During initial portfolio construction, Dunmere intentionally constrains project size and complexity while refining execution standards.
Discipline is enforced through documented steps. Projects may be paused or declined at any stage if new information materially alters risk.
Initial review against pricing, scope, and exit criteria.
Model conservative scenarios and stress-test assumptions.
Document scope, budget, timeline, and risk flags before closing.
Manage to plan, adjust prudently, and review outcomes post-exit.
Outcomes may be affected by cost overruns, delays, market conditions, or execution challenges. Capital loss is possible. Dunmere’s goal is informed risk — not its elimination.
The best next step is a straightforward discussion about goals, constraints, and expectations.
